A Level History - America - Practice Exam 2026 - Free Practice Questions and Study Guide

The significant outcome of the Supreme Court's actions regarding the New Deal was the unconstitutional rulings against multiple New Deal acts. During the 1930s, the Supreme Court, comprised of justices who held a more conservative view, struck down several key programs proposed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt's administration. The Court ruled that certain New Deal legislation overstepped federal powers or infringed upon states' rights, particularly in cases like the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) and the Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA).

These rulings reflected the judicial branch's resistance to extensive federal intervention in the economy, which was a hallmark of Roosevelt's New Deal. The backlash from the Supreme Court not only led to significant amendments in how New Deal programs were structured but also prompted Roosevelt to attempt court-packing in 1937, aiming to influence the Court's composition. This period illustrated the tension between the executive branch's agenda for economic recovery and the judiciary's limitations on federal power, thereby shaping the development of American law and governance during that era.